Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Clarifying last statements on Kant ...

I don't think i said that real well ... though the main point is probably clear.
I'll break it down using the Paul Guyer break-out:

The Critique of Pure Reason ... the meat of the book ... and the mass ... is covered in The Transcendental Logic

The Transcendental Logic has 2 divisions ...
The Transcendental Analytic
The Transcendental Deduction

The TA is there to say that there is "synthetic a priori" knowledge, but it is only available through the sense. Kant's critique of space and time and such notions about which i post from time to time all falls under this section. All talk of the "understanding" falls under here.

The TD, about which i attempted to speak last post, is a destructive turn. Its purpose is to show that dogmatic metaphysics cannot be a ground for knowledge.

A big part of the Critique's force revolves around whether one agrees that synthetic a priori judgements are possible. Or, like Morton White, you may deny that claim.

(more later)

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi o)

I enjoyed the experience of visiting your web site and am keen
to become more familiar with the ideas you introduce to your readers... I
have spent the last few hours; totally mesmerized by the contents... I
(webmaster) am making so many mental notes; and learning so much
stuff... I can�t thank you enough... Great stuff!!

JOURNAL

5:50 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home